The Concept of Revealed by Includes Which of the Following

A critical question for anyone handling classified information in government and military contexts revolves around the concept of “Revealed By.” This classification principle plays a vital role in protecting national security and preventing unauthorized disclosure of sensitive data.

Derivative classification heavily depends on correctly identifying whether information is “revealed by” or simply “contained in” a document. National security faces serious risks when information receives incorrect markings. DoD Manual 5200.01 outlines specific guidelines that users must follow to classify and mark information effectively. These guidelines help promote information sharing while protecting sensitive content. Derivative classifiers must carry forward classification guidance along with applicable downgrading and declassification instructions.

This complete guide will explain the true meaning of “revealed by” and show how it is different from other classification concepts. You’ll find practical examples that will help you apply these principles correctly when working with classified materials.

What is Derivative Classification?

Derivative classification serves as the life-blood of information security in government and defense sectors. Original classification differs from derivative classification because it doesn’t need an original determination that information needs protection. The process works differently.

Definition and purpose

Derivative classification happens when someone incorporates, paraphrases, restates, or creates new forms of already classified information. The newly developed material must match the source information’s classification markings. This process will give a protected status to classified information as it changes into new documents or formats.

Note that derivative classification doesn’t mean just duplicating or reproducing existing classified information. A photocopied classified document doesn’t count as derivative classification.

You don’t need original classification authority to become a derivative classifier. Government and contractor employees can work as derivative classifiers if they:

• Have subject matter expertise
• Know classification management techniques
• Complete proper training

Derivative classification has a clear purpose: classified information must stay protected as it reshapes into new documents. Sensitive information remains secure throughout its lifecycle this way, whatever its new format or incorporation into new materials.

Why it matters for national security

National security faces several effects from derivative classification. The most important effect limits sensitive information access to people with security eligibility and legitimate need-to-know. This restriction helps stop unauthorized disclosure that could hurt national interests or operations.

More than that, derivative classification creates uniform and conforming government-wide classification standards. Different agencies and departments need this consistency to maintain information security.

Notwithstanding that, derivative classification brings most important responsibilities. Derivative classifiers must follow the original classification authority’s decision. They must carry forward relevant classification markings to any new documents. This requirement helps keep original security determinations safe throughout the information lifecycle.

On top of that, classification affects resources heavily. Security measures cost money, including:

• Security eligibility processes
• Physical security implementations
• Protection countermeasures

These far-reaching effects mean derivative classifiers must follow proper procedures and meet all requirements. They need to apply the highest standards when they classify information derivatively. They can’t over-classify or under-classify materials.

Then, training becomes mandatory. Derivative classifiers must take classification training before they start derivative classification work. They must retake it every two years. Their authority stops until they meet this requirement.

The government can balance protecting national security and sharing information among cleared individuals through proper derivative classification.

Understanding the Concept of ‘Revealed By’

Classified information management demands a clear grasp of subtle concepts that can make all the difference between secure protocols and security risks. The principle of “Revealed By” often creates confusion among professionals.

What does ‘Revealed By’ mean?

The “Revealed By” concept kicks in when derivative classifiers add classified information from an authorized source into a new document, even though the source document doesn’t state it clearly. This goes beyond simple copying and needs deeper interpretation.

“Revealed By” happens when someone can figure out classified information through analysis rather than finding it stated outright. Here’s a simple example: a source document might say “(S) The length of the course is two hours.” Your derivative document states “(S) The first half of the course is one hour and will focus on what derivative classification is”. Anyone reading this can work out the classified information about the two-hour duration through basic math.

This matters because derivative classifiers must review information carefully to spot elements that need classification. They should know when simple details might give away classified information indirectly.

How it is different from ‘Contained In’

“Revealed By” and “Contained In” are the foundations of derivative classification. “Contained In” means copying or paraphrasing classified information straight from a source, while “Revealed By” needs you to connect the dots.

Let’s look at examples that show this difference:

“Contained In” works like this: A source document says “(S) The weapon may successfully be deployed at a range of 70 miles.” If you use the same statement in your new document, that’s “Contained In”.

“Revealed By” looks more like this: A source document states “(S) The process takes three hours to complete.” Your new document says “(S) The first step takes 30 minutes. The second step takes 2 hours, and the final step takes 30 minutes”. You can add up the times to get the classified three-hour duration.

Here’s another example showing how context reveals classified details: “(S) The training exercise runs Monday through Friday and occurs every June based on trainer availability. The only trainer currently certified is running other exercises the first three weeks in June”. This tells us the training will happen in the last week of June without saying it directly.

Select all the correct responses: the concept of revealed by has which of the following

The concept of “Revealed By” has these essential elements:

• Source documents don’t state classified information clearly or explicitly
• Readers can figure out classified information through interpretation or analysis[93][94]
• Derivative classifiers need training on derivative classification principles

Subject matter expertise helps but isn’t always necessary. The main focus stays on how people can deduce and interpret information. Derivative classifiers who understand this concept can maintain security protocols effectively and avoid both over-classification and under-classification, which can seriously impact information security and access.

Examples of ‘Revealed By’ in Action

Classification principles show subtle nuances that need careful attention in real-life applications. Security professionals must understand how “revealed by” works in actual scenarios to help derivative classifiers make appropriate security determinations.

Scenario 1: Inferring classified dates

Dates linked to classified operations need protection. Let’s look at this example: a document states “(C) The training exercise will last three days” and “(S) The training exercise will begin 21 April.” The Security Classification Guide marks exercise length as Confidential and dates as Secret. A new document stating “The training exercise lasts three days, ending on 24 April” must be classified as Secret.

Readers can calculate the start date by subtracting three days from the end date. This calculation reveals the classified start date (April 21) through simple deduction. The example shows how “revealed by” works when information emerges through simple analysis.

Scenario 2: Aggregating unclassified data

Unclassified information can become classified when combined specifically. CUI-protected information (Controlled Unclassified Information) remains unclassified, yet needs controls because it often reveals exploitable information to adversaries when publicly linked to defense missions or combined with other sources.

Another example clarifies this: a document contains participant information “(S) Adams, Leighty, and Shaw will participate in training exercise BLUE EAGLE” and timing information “(C) The training exercise BLUE EAGLE will commence at 0600 on 10 October.” A new statement like “Shaw will be unavailable on 10 October due to participation in the training exercise BLUE EAGLE” must be classified as Secret. This combination exposes both the classified participant and timing information.

Scenario 3: Deducing troop movements

Troop movements demand critical operational security. A source document states “(S) There will be 80,000 troops deployed to Ilkeborg.” A new document mentioning “(S) Forty-thousand troops will approach Ilkeborg from the west, and another 40,000 will approach from the east” creates a “revealed by” scenario.

The total number matches the original document, but directional information lets readers deduce deployment strategy. Operational plans need protection as they directly affect national security. Troop movements, deployment strategies, and operational plans must have appropriate classification to prevent compromising operations.

Derivative classification: the concept of revealed by includes which of the following

Authoritative sources show that the concept of “revealed by” has:

1. Information needing additional interpretation or analysis to deduce classified content
2. Content not explicitly stated in the source document but calculable or inferable
3. Information that combined or aggregated reveals protected data
4. Details allowing readers to deduce classified information through logical reasoning

Derivative classifiers must understand these elements to identify when the “revealed by” principle applies. This understanding ensures proper protection of national security information and prevents both over-classification and under-classification. Proper application needs training, alertness, and critical thinking about how readers might interpret or analyze information to derive classified insights.

How to Apply ‘Revealed By’ in Real Documents

Sound judgment and structured guidance play vital roles in the proper application of the “revealed by” concept in ground scenarios. Government professionals must employ time-tested tools and protocols. This approach helps maintain classification integrity and prevents disclosure pitfalls.

Using Security Classification Guides (SCGs)

Security Classification Guides are the life-blood of correctly applying the “revealed by” concept. These guides document original classification decisions that serve as source documents for creating derivatively classified materials. SCGs offer detailed classification guidance on program-specific information that helps derivative classifiers apply appropriate classification markings consistently.

The Department of Defense requires Original Classification Authorities (OCAs) to issue SCGs. These guides aid standardized classification management and promote information sharing. Such an approach simplifies classified national security information management while ensuring proper protection.

Derivative classifiers must check whether deducible information appears as classified in the guide. To cite an instance, see if an SCG states that the “length of course” has a certain classification level. Any information that could reveal course length must carry the same classification.

When to seek clarification

Derivative classifiers often face situations where classification guidance seems unclear or contradictory. Rather than guessing how to mark documents, asking for clarification becomes essential.

Classification uncertainty requires these steps:

• Ask your supervisor or manager first
• Check your company’s policies and procedures manual
• Reach out to your Security Manager, OCA (for DoD employees), or FSO/Government Contracting Activity (for contractors)

The SCG takes precedence when conflict exists between a source document and itself. DoD Manual 5200.01 requires OCAs to reevaluate classification levels right away if classified information faces potential compromise.

Avoiding accidental disclosure

Anyone handling classified information must prevent inadvertent disclosure. The biggest problem stems from accidentally revealing privileged or protected information during processing or document production.

Federal Rules state that recipients must act quickly upon discovering inadvertent disclosure. They need to return, sequester, or destroy materials. The rules prohibit using the information until the claim resolves. Recipients must take reasonable steps to retrieve any disclosed information.

Electronic documents need extra attention due to metadata. Hidden information could lead to inadvertent disclosure through improperly cleaned redacted text. This becomes especially important when classification by compilation occurs – a situation where combining two or more pieces of unclassified information reveals classified data.

Common Mistakes and Legal Consequences

Mishandling classified information creates risks that go beyond organizational embarrassment and affect national security. These risks come from both intentional violations and careless handling of sensitive materials.

Misinterpreting classification levels

Overclassification remains a persistent problem throughout government agencies. Insiders estimate that all but one of these classified documents could safely be made public. The government makes about 50 million classification decisions each year. This represents an enormous volume of unnecessarily restricted information.

The paradox stands clear—when everything gets classified, the system loses its value. Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart noted, “When everything is classified, then nothing is classified, and the system becomes one to be disregarded by the cynical or the careless”. People’s lack of respect for classification standards puts genuinely sensitive information at greater risk.

Overclassification stops democratic debate and self-governance. It undermines the rule of law by potentially shielding governmental misconduct. It can stop timely sharing of threat information—something the 9/11 Commission identified as contributing to intelligence failures.

Administrative sanctions: select all the correct responses

Government employees face multiple administrative consequences for violating classification protocols. These sanctions apply when officials “knowingly and willingly commit a violation” and has these penalties:

• Reprimand
• Suspension without pay
• Removal from position
• Termination of classification authority
• Other sanctions in accordance with applicable laws or regulations

Keep in mind that information must never be classified to “conceal violations of law, inefficiency, or administrative error, or to prevent embarrassment to a person, organization or agency, or to restrain competition”. Government employees who think information is improperly classified should raise concerns with superiors or classification authorities.

Criminal penalties for unauthorized disclosure

Criminal penalties for unauthorized disclosure go beyond administrative sanctions. Anyone who knowingly and willfully communicates classified information to unauthorized persons faces up to ten years in prison, substantial fines, or both. On top of that, offenders must give up any property they derived from or used in the violation.

The Privacy Act has criminal penalties too—misdemeanors with fines up to $5,000—for willful improper disclosure of protected records. Criminal prosecution under espionage statutes may apply for classified cryptographic or communication intelligence information.

You need to understand what “revealed by” means—not just to follow procedures, but to avoid consequences that could end your career or limit your freedom.

Summing all up

Anyone handling classified information must understand the subtle concept of “revealed by.” We have gotten into how information classification goes beyond direct copying. It also applies when someone can figure things out through analysis or inference.

Derivative classification needs careful attention to detail, especially with information that indirectly shows classified content. The most important aspect is knowing when dates, troop movements, or combined data could expose sensitive information through deduction. This knowledge helps protect national security.

The difference between “revealed by” and “contained in” shapes how we handle classified documents. “Contained in” means direct copying or paraphrasing. “Revealed by” has situations where readers can calculate, infer, or figure out classified information that isn’t clearly stated. This subtle difference plays a crucial role in classification decisions.

Security Classification Guides will give a solid foundation to make the right choices. However, derivative classifiers must use good judgment and ask questions when they’re unsure. Not following these principles correctly can result in serious problems, from administrative punishments to criminal charges.

Overclassification creates its own issues. It can make the whole classification system less valuable and block necessary information sharing. Finding the right balance between protecting sensitive information and avoiding unnecessary restrictions needs both technical know-how and good judgment.

Our national security ended up depending on proper classification practices. Derivative classifiers who really understand what “revealed by” means can better protect sensitive information while keeping appropriate information flowing. Their alertness keeps classified information safe, whether it’s clearly stated or just implied through context, calculations, or combinations of seemingly harmless details.

Here are some FAQs about the concept of revealed by includes which of the following:

What does the concept of revealed by include?

The concept of revealed by includes which of the following, select all the correct responses: information that is explicitly stated in the source document and classification guidance. It also encompasses information that is logically deduced from the source material. The concept revealed by includes which of the following applies to any data that can be clearly connected to or derived from authorized classification sources.

Which of the following statements apply to the classification concept revealed by?

When considering select all the correct responses the concept of revealed by includes which of the following, it applies to information directly present in classification guidance. The concept of revealed by includes which of the following, select all the correct responses also covers information that can be logically concluded from classified source material. However, it does not include entirely new information or independent analysis not tied to existing classified data.

What is contained in concept in derivative classification?

The concept in derivative classification contains the principle that the concept of revealed by includes which of the following, select all the correct responses regarding source-derived information. It includes both the “revealed by” and “contained in” concepts that guide proper classification decisions. These principles ensure derivative classifiers properly identify and mark information based on authorized sources.

What is identify the concept used to determine the new document using the SCG?

The concept used is the same as the concept of revealed by includes which of the following, select all the correct responses when working with Security Classification Guides (SCGs). This means applying the “revealed by” standard to determine what information from the SCG applies to the new document. The concept revealed by includes which of the following elements that must be properly identified and marked in the derivative document.

What is the contextual meaning of revealed?

In classification contexts, “revealed” refers to the concept of revealed by includes which of the following, select all of the correct responses regarding information exposure. It means information that is either explicitly shown or can be logically inferred from classified sources. This differs from general usage as it specifically relates to authorized disclosure through classification channels.

Which concept was used to determine the derivative of the new document?

The primary concept used is the concept of revealed by includes which of the following, select all the correct responses framework. This means the derivative classification was determined by what information was revealed by or contained in source documents. The concept revealed by includes which of the following authorized sources provided the basis for proper classification decisions.